Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

409- 416


Authors Details

Gayatri Bhonsale*, Ishita Mehta, Priyanka Hitesh Gandhi, Reshma Ramakrishnan, Syed Faraaz Hussain


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 510

PDF Downloaded: 429


A comparative study of subtenon’s anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery in patients with age related cataracts


Original Article

Author Details : Gayatri Bhonsale*, Ishita Mehta, Priyanka Hitesh Gandhi, Reshma Ramakrishnan, Syed Faraaz Hussain

Volume : 8, Issue : 3, Year : 2022

Article Page : 409-416

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2022.083



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Aim: To compare the safety, efficacy and ease of administration of subtenon’s anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery(MSICS) and assess the surgeon and patient comfort.
Settings and Design: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among 200 patients undergoing MSICS at a rural tertiary care hospital wherein patients were randomly divided into the two groups of peribulbar (P) and subtenon’s (ST) block.
Materials and Methods: After randomization, 200 patients were assessed for various factors including pain at the time of administration of anaesthetic, time to attain akinesia, patient’s comfort and satisfaction score.
Results: 200 eyes of 200 patients who underwent MSCIS were divided into Peribulbar and Subtenon’s group by random number table; of which 122 were women (61%) and 78 were men (39%). There was a significant difference in the amount of anaesthetic used, with the group P (8.37+1.19 ml) usage being more than the group ST(4.02+0.91 ml) (p<0 p=0.008)> Results: Significantly greater number of eyes in group ST had mild and moderate chemosis and subconjunctival haemorrhage compared to group P(p<0> Conclusion: We found that subtenon’s anaesthesia was an equally effective technique for achieving analgesia and akinesia when compared to peribulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing MSICS.


Keywords : Key­words: Subtenon's, Peribulbar, MSICS


How to cite : Bhonsale G, Mehta I, Gandhi P H, Ramakrishnan R, Hussain S F, A comparative study of subtenon’s anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery in patients with age related cataracts. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022;8(3):409-416

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.